E04052: Sozomen in his Ecclesiastical History recounts the transfer of the head of *John (the Baptist, S00020) to Constantinople: discovered by Macedonianist monks in Palestine, and brought to a village in the territory of Chalcedon (north-west Asia Minor, near Constantinople) under Valens, probably in the late 360s or 370s, it was deposited at Hebdomon (suburb of Constantinople) under Theodosius I, after 381. Written in Greek at Constantinople, 439/450.
‘(1) About this time, the head of John the Baptist, which Herodias had asked of Herod the tetrarch, was transferred to Constantinople. It is said that it was discovered by monks of the sect of Makedonios, who originally dwelt at Constantinople, and were later resettled in Cilicia. (2) Under the previous emperor, Mardonios who was the chief eunuch of the palace had made this discovery known, and Valens commanded that the relic be brought to Constantinople. The men appointed for the task took it on a state carriage and set off. When they arrived at Panteichion, which is a settlement in the territory of Chalcedon, the mules drawing the carriage refused to advance further, even though the drivers kept threatening them and the driver was scourging them terribly with the lash. (3) Yet they would not move at all, and everyone, including the emperor himself, thought that the incident was extraordinary and of divine provenance; so they deposited this holy head at the village of Kosilaos, which happened to be nearby and belonged to the said Mardonios.
(4) Now during the period we are talking about here, the emperor Theodosius, induced by God or by the Prophet himself, arrived at this village. As he intended to take away the relic of the Baptist, they say that the only person who opposed him was Matrona, a consecrated virgin who was serving as its minister and guardian. As she was resisting with all her strength, he thought it inappropriate to use coercion and instead begged her for permission.
(5) She consented very reluctantly, believing that the emperor would fail in his endeavour, as it had happened with Valens. The emperor wrapped the chest where the relic was resting with his purple cloak, and departed with it. He deposited it outside the city of Constantinople at the place called Hebdomon, where he erected a very large and beautiful shrine. As for Matrona, although he besought her profusely and persistently, promising splendid rewards, he failed to persuade her to change her religious views. For she adhered to the sect of Makedonios.
(6) By contrast, Vikentios, a presbyter of her creed, who also used to worship and serve as a cleric by the coffin of the Prophet, immediately followed the emperor and entered into communion with the Catholic Church. Indeed, although he had taken an oath, as the Macedonianists affirm, never to swerve from their creed, in the end he openly declared that, if the Baptist had decided to follow the emperor, he also would enter into communion with him unreservedly. (7) He was a Persian and, when a persecution befell the Christians of Persia, during the reign of Constantius, he fled together with his nephew, Addas, and moved to the Roman Empire. (8) He joined the clergy and advanced to the office of presbyter. As for Addas, he married and rendered great service to the Church, for he has left a son named Auxentios who is a man highly devoted to our religion and faithful to his friends, proper in his lifestyle, a keen scholar well versed in the writings of both pagan and ecclesiastical authors, and also a moderate character. He is very close to the emperor and his entourage and has been appointed to a splendid office in the imperial service. The monks and zealous people who have known him speak of him very highly.
(9) As for Matrona, she lived at the village of Kosilaos to the end of her life. She lived a very godly and pious life, leading a community of consecrated virgins, many of whom, I understand, are still alive, displaying a conduct worthy of their training under Matrona.’
Text: Bidez and Hansen 1995. Translation: E. Rizos.
Literary - Other narrative texts (including Histories)
Language
Greek
Evidence not before
439
Evidence not after
450
Activity not before
360
Activity not after
391
Place of Evidence - Region
Constantinople and region
Place of Evidence - City, village, etc
Constantinople
Place of evidence - City name in other Language(s)
Constantinople
Constantinople
Κωνσταντινούπολις
Konstantinoupolis
Constantinopolis
Constantinople
Istanbul
Major author/Major anonymous work
Sozomen
Cult activities - Places
Cult building - independent (church)
Cult Activities - Miracles
Miracle after death
Miraculous behaviour of relics/images
Saint aiding or preventing the translation of relics
Miracles causing conversion
Cult Activities - Protagonists in Cult and Narratives
Women
Ecclesiastics - monks/nuns/hermits
Ecclesiastics - lesser clergy
Heretics
Animals
Cult Activities - Relics
Bodily relic - head
Discovering, finding, invention and gathering of relics
Privately owned relics
Transfer, translation and deposition of relics
Transfer/presence of relics from distant countries
Source
Salamenios Hermeias Sozomenos (known in English as Sozomen) was born in the early 5th c. to a wealthy Christian family, perhaps of Arab origins, in the village of Bethelea near Gaza. He was educated at a local monastic school, studied law probably at Beirut, and settled in Constantinople where he pursued a career as a lawyer.
Sozomen published his Ecclesiastical History between 439 and 450, perhaps around 445. It consists of nine books, the last of which is incomplete. In his dedication of the work, Sozomen states that he intended to cover the period from the conversion of Constantine to the seventeenth consulate of Theodosius II, that is, 312 to 439, but the narrative of the extant text breaks in about 425. The basis of Sozomen’s work is the Ecclesiastical History of Socrates, published a few years earlier, which our author revises and expands. Like Socrates, Sozomen was devoted to Nicene Orthodoxy and the Theodosian dynasty, but his work is marked by stronger hagiographical interests, a richer base of sources, and different sympathies/loyalties. Sozomen probably lacked the classical education of Socrates, but had a broader knowledge of hagiographical and monastic literature and traditions, which makes him a fuller source for the cult of saints. Besides Greek and Latin, Sozomen knew Aramaic, which allowed him to include information about ascetic communities, monastic founders, and martyrs from his native Palestine, Arabia, Syria, Mesopotamia, and Persia, to which Socrates had had no access. Much like the other ecclesiastical historians of the fourth and fifth centuries, Sozomen focuses on the East Roman Empire, only seldom referring to the West and Persia.
Discussion
Sozomen records meticulously the transfers of relics that took place under the Theodosian emperors, suggesting that this was an important aspect in the religious policy of these emperors. The miraculous revelations of relics are treated as signs of divine benevolence and events which promote the good name of the Christian faith. The story about the head of the Baptist is intended to provide a supernatural confirmation of Theodosius’ orthodoxy. John’s head refused to enter Constantinople under the Arian Valens and stopped in the outskirts of Chalcedon. It was willing, however, to follow the orthodox emperor Theodosius.
The head follows an interesting itinerary before arriving to the capital. It was discovered by Macedonianist monks, and kept by them at a monastery on the private estate of the eunuch Mardonios, imperial chamberlain. The site of that shrine is the otherwise unattested site of Kosilaos near Panteichion (today’s Pendik in Anatolian Istanbul). Theodosius houses it at a church which he builds at Hebdomon (Bakırköy). The shrine consisted of two churches, a basilica dedicated to John the Evangelist, and a rotunda of John the Baptist (Patria of Constantinople, 3. 144-145). Sozomen mentions its foundation by Theodosius I also in 8.4.14-15. The Paschal Chronicle dates the deposition of the head at Hebdomon to 17 February 391 (564.13-19, E###).
The role of monastic communities in spreading the relics and cult of John is remarkable. Jerome of Stridon (Ep. 108.13; E###), and the church historians Rufinus of Aquileia (E04543) and Philostorgius (E04196) report that the tomb of John was venerated by the Christians at Sebaste of Palestine, together those of the prophets Elisha and Obadiah. The bones were reportedly burned and scattered by the pagans under Julian the Apostate (361-363), but collected by monks. Rufinus reports that these relics were sent to Athanasius in Alexandria (E04543). Palladius of Helenopolis mentions that relics of John were kept by monks on the Mount of Olives in Jerusalem (see E03329).
Sozomen's acknowledgement of the heterodox identity of the monks who brought the relic to Constantinople is interesting. Although the author does not share Socrates’ sympathy for the Novatians, he is still interested in the histories of the dissident communities and their leaders, adding information and hagiographical anecdotes concerning the Novatians and Macedonianists. This is one of several episodes echoing his personal contacts and appreciation for the Macedonianist ascetic communities. At the end of the account, Sozomen indirectly acknowledges his source for this story, Auxentios, the grandson of the former Macedonianist priest and Persian émigré Vikentios who had witnessed the acquisition of John's head by Theodosius I. Sozomen's affectionate words for Auxentios suggest that they knew each other from their work in the imperial service and their connections to monastic cycles.
Bibliography
Text:
Bidez, J., and Hansen, G. C., Sozomenus. Kirchengeschichte. 2nd rev. ed. (Die griechischen christlichen Schriftsteller der ersten Jahrhunderte, Neue Folge 4; Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 1995).
Translations:
Grillet, B., Sabbah, G., Festugière A.-J. Sozomène, Histoire ecclésiastique. 4 vols. (Sources chrétiennes 306, 418, 495, 516; Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 1983-2008): text, French translation, and introduction.
Hansen, G.C. Sozomen, Historia ecclesiastica, Kirchengeschichte, 4 vols. (Fontes Christiani 73; Turnhout: Brepols, 2004): text, German translation, and introduction.
Hartranft, C.D. “The Ecclesiastical History of Sozomen, Comprising a History of the Church from AD 323 to AD 425." In A Select Library of Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers of the Christian Church: Second Series, edited by P. Schaff and H. Wace (New York: Christian Literature Company, 1890), 179-427.
Further reading:
Chesnut, G. F. The First Christian Histories: Eusebius, Socrates, Sozomen, Theodoret, and Evagrius (Atlanta: Mercer University, 1986).
Cronnier, E. Les inventions de reliques dans l’Empire romain d’Orient (IVe-VIe s.) (Turnhout: Brepols, 2016).
Janin, R. La géographie ecclésiastique de l'empire Byzantin. I 3: Les eglises et les monastères de la ville de Constantinople (Paris, 1969).
Leppin, H. Von Constantin dem Grossen zu Theodosius II. Das christliche Kaisertum bei den Kirchenhistorikern Socrates, Sozomenus und Theodoret (Hypomnemata 110; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1996).
Van Nuffelen, P., Un héritage de paix et de piété : Étude sur les histoires ecclésiastiques de Socrate et de Sozomène (Orientalia Lovaniensia Analecta 142; Leuven: Peeters, 2004).