E02297: John Chrysostom, in his homily On the Ascension, delivered during a service for the feast of the Ascension of Christ held at the extramural martyr shrine of the Romanesian Gate of Antioch (Syria), records how Bishop Flavianos had the relics of the saints exhumed and deposited in a separate place for veneration, in order to separate them from the burials of heretics. Written in Greek at Antioch, 386/397.
online resource
posted on 2017-02-01, 00:00authored byerizos
John Chrysostom, On the Ascension of Our Lord Jesus Christ (CPG 4342, BHG 1191n)
‘On the Ascension of our Lord Jesus Christ. Delivered at the martyrion of the Romanesia (gate), where bodies of martyrs, resting under the ground near the remains of heretics, were collected and buried separately above.
‘When we were celebrating the memory of the Cross, we held the festival outside the city, and now also, that we celebrate the Ascension of the Crucifix on this bright and splendid day, again we hold the feast outside the city. We do not do this, in order to downgrade the city, but out of eagerness to honour the martyrs. So that these saints may not complain to us and say: “Didn’t we deserve to see a day of our Lord being celebrated at our dwellings?” That these saints may not complain to us and say that: “We were granted to pour out our blood for Him and to have our heads cut off, but we have not been granted to see the day of His feast being celebrated at our lodgings!” For these reasons, we have left the city and hastened to the feet of these saints, offering, through the present day, an apology to them also for the time that has passed. For, if it was necessary to hasten towards these champions of the true religion in the past, when they lay under ground, much more do we need to do that now that the pearls are on their own, that the sheep have been rid of the wolves, that the living have been separated from the dead. Of course, even before this moment, they suffered no harm from their company in burial. The bodies of those whose spirits are in heaven suffered no harm from what surrounded them. The relics of those whose soul is in the hand of God suffered nothing from their location. Indeed, there was no harm for them, even before this occasion. Our people, however, suffered no mean damage from the place, as, on the one hand, they hastened towards the relics of the martyrs, but, on the other, they said their prayers in doubt and ambiguity, because it was unknown where the burials of the saints were, and where the true treasures lay. It was as if flocks of sheep were arriving eager to enjoy a pure stream of water from pure springs, but were turned back by a stench coming from the vicinity. That is precisely what used to happen to this flock: the people walked to the pure springs of the martyrs, but, sensing heretical odour coming up from the vicinity, they were driven away again. This thing, then, was known to this wise shepherd and common teacher of ours [the bishop of Antioch Flavianos], who arranges everything to the edification of the Church, and he did not suffer to overlook this damage for too long – this fervent lover and enthusiast of the martyrs! But what has he done? Consider his wisdom: on the on hand, he buried and blocked off the muddy and stinking streams in the ground; on the other, he placed the pure sources of the martyrs in a clean place. And consider how much sympathy for the dead, how much honour for the martyrs, and how much care for the people he has displayed: for the dead, he displayed sympathy, as he did not move their bones, but allowed them to remain on the site; for the martyrs, he showed honour, having rid them from their evil company; for the people he displayed care, for he did not abandon them offering their prayers in ambiguity. For these reasons, we have brought you here, in order that the assembly may become brighter and the spectacle more splendid, for it will not be just people gathering, but also martyrs, and not just martyrs, but also angels. (…)’
There follows a contemplation on the invisible protective presence of angels during worship.
John of Antioch, bishop of Constantinople, who came to be known as Chrysostom (the Golden Mouth), was born in 344/354 in Antioch on the Orontes where he studied under Libanius. He joined the Nicene Christian community of Antioch, led by bishop Meletios of Antioch, and was ordained priest by Meletios’ successor, Flavianos in 386. Acquiring a great reputation as a preacher, John was appointed as bishop of Constantinople in 397. Clashing with the bishop of Alexandria Theophilos and the empress Eudoxia in 403/404, Chrysostom was deposed and banished to Cucusus in Cappadocia and died in Comana of Pontus in 407.
There is currently no critical edition of the text. On the manuscripts, see:
http://pinakes.irht.cnrs.fr/notices/oeuvre/7572/
Discussion
This sermon provides evidence for an early example of exhumation and ‘elevation’ of relics of martyrs, here in the context of the refurbishment of a shrine, passing from one Christian denomination to another.
According to the title of our text, which may be a later addition, the venue of this sermon was the martyrion of the Romanesia, one of the gates of Antioch. The Romanesia was probably on the west side of the city, giving onto the road to Seleucia and Alexandretta (it is mentioned by Athanasius of Alexandria, Petitiones Arianorum 1, and Palladius, Life of John Chrysostom, 30.5; Palladius also mentions the shrine of the martyrs). Topographically, it could fit with the location of the cruciform martyrium excavated by Glanville Downie and Jean Lassus at the site of Kaoussie in 1935 – the excavators identified the building as the shrine of *Babylas, founded by Meletios of Antioch.
The sermon was given on Ascension Day, but it is unknown if it was a standard practice to celebrate this day at the martyrion of the Romanesia. In another sermon, Chrysostom reports that the service of Good Friday was customarily celebrated at another extramural shrine and cemetery, the Koimeterion (E02298). Here, however, the occasion seems to have been special, instigated by the rededication of the shrine in its refurbished form.
Like all the churches and shrines of Antioch, this martyrion was controlled by the Arian bishops of Antioch from the 330s until the restoration of the churches to the Nicenes in 381. Apparently, during this period, the Arian community buried its members ad sanctos, at the shrines of the martyrs. Given the prestige of the sites, these graves must have included officials and clerics. It seems that after the restoration of the shrines to the Nicene community, some found the presence of these Arian tombs disturbing, as they wished to be sure that their prayer was offered before the remains of martyrs and not of some doomed heretic. The solution employed by the Nicene bishop Flavianos was to move the relics of the saints to a distinguished place, so as to facilitate their veneration. It is remarkable that Flavianos did not opt to ‘cleanse’ the shrine by removing the unwanted graves. Besides the possible tensions it would have caused, such a radical move would also have been against the law which prohibited the removal and disturbance of graves. What Chrysostom presents as an act of humane sympathy for the dead may have been a matter of necessity.
It has been correctly pointed out that Chrysostom’s account is strongly reminiscent of the situation at the excavated church of Kaoussie, where some burials were found completely covered by the mosaic pavements, while others were distinguished by a slab or structure on or above ground level. The mosaics of the building are epigraphically identified as the dedication of bishop Flavianos, thus suggesting that the martyrion of this sermon and the excavated church may indeed be the same building (Mayer 2010).
Bibliography
Text:
Migne, J.-P., Patrologia Graeca 50 (Paris, 1862), 441-452.
Further reading:
Downey, G., Ancient Antioch (Princeton, 1961).
Drobner, H.R., The Fathers of the Church: A Comprehensive Introduction (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2007), 327-337.
Kelly, J.N.D., Golden Mouth: The Story of John Chrysostom. Ascetic, Preacher, Bishop (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1995).
Mayer, W., "The Late Antique Church at Qausīyeh Reconsidered: Memory and Martyr-Burial in Syrian Antioch," in: J. Leemans (ed.), Martyrdom and Persecution in Late Antique Christianity: Festschrift Boudewijn Dehandschutter (Bibliotheca Ephemeridum Theologicarum Lovaniensium 241; Leuven: Peeters, 2010), 161-77.
Mayer, W., and Allen, P., The Churches of Syrian Antioch (300‒638 CE) (Late Antique History and Religion 5; Leuven: Peeters, 2012), 94-95.